Hi,
I have five new reviews and an update for you today.All past reviews and current trials can be found here:
http://www.cash-master.com/
Bonus Bagging
Tested and Reviewed by Arthur
I have decided to change this to a one-off review. Having used this
service for a week I believe I understand enough about how this
service operates.
As the sales page states this service shows "you how to cash out
all bonuses offered by casinos and bookmakers completely risk free
and make £1000's in RISK FREE profit". You could, of course, do
this for yourself but it is a faff, and for a one-off payment of
£27 (currently) Mike does all the hard-work for you making this
hassle free. So no subscriptions and there is a money-back
guarantee too.
I have easily cleared the payment in the first week, and not from
sign-up bonuses, as I am signed up with (too?) many bookmakers
already. It appears that a risk-free profit target of around £500
per month is easily achievable. A nice second income!
Most of available offers can be claimed by activity in the
evenings, so 9to5ers out there can use this service too.
So why not bag yourself some risk-free money and sign-up today?
Happy to approve this service.
You can get Bonus Bagging here:
http://www.cash-master.com/
Irish Big Race Trends
Reviewed by Matt Bisogno
Matt Bisogno is a horse racing, trends, and betting system
enthusiast who blogs regularly over at www.geegeez.co.uk
Graham asked me to write a one off review for readers of Cash
Master about a product called, Irish Big Race Trends (or IBRT
hereafter, for obvious reasons).
Now at this point I need to declare a legacy interest. You see,
when Tony was starting out he came to me to ask for help promoting
his product. I was impressed with it and we worked together in the
early days of IBRT.
Since then, Tony's gone on to create a very attractive product /
service. So what is IBRT, and what will it do for you?
Well, as the name suggests, this is a trends-based product that
looks at the top Irish races, of which there are many, generally
run on weekends as well.
The thing I really like about IBRT that I haven't seen anywhere
else, is that it breaks the trends down into two parts. Firstly,
there are the 'Primary Trends'. These are the most robust, logical
patterns that previous winners of the race have adhered to.
At the end of that section for each race a shortlist is drawn up,
comprising those runners to satisfy the Primary Trends.
[Occasionally a horse misses a trends by a small margin and is
included].
Then, the shortlist is whittled down further by Secondary Trends -
reasonable profile aspects of previous winners, though not as
'bankable' as the Primary Trends.
At the end of that, we're left with a selection and a danger.
Here's an example which, granted has been cherry-picked (!), to
illustrate how the manual works:
3.05 Kilboy Estate Stakes (Listed) (3YO+) 1m1f
Race RAG Status: GREEN
Primary Trends
All of the last 6 winners were aged 3 to 5
The last 6 winners were Irish trained
5 of the last 6 winners had run three or more times that season
5 of the last 6 winners were running within 25 days
The last 6 winners finished in the first five last time out
The last 5 winners had won or finished 2nd in a Listed or better
race
Shortlist
Latin Love
Secondary Trends
4 of the last 5 favourites were unplaced
5 of the last 6 winners were single figure prices
5 of the last 6 winners had an official rating of 100+
5 of the last 6 winners had a pre race RPR 101+
5 of the last 6 winners had previously finished in the first 2 at
The Curragh
Selection(s)
One horse stands out with a perfect trends profile. Latin Love has
twice finished second over this somewhat specialist distance,
including in this race last year behind She's Our Mark, and has
been placed all three times she's tried the trip.
Having had four runs this season, her last being three weeks ago,
and with requisite official and Racing Post ratings, Ryan Moore
looks a 'job' booking.
Despite a bumper field of 18 runners, Latin Love looks sure to go
close and is a confident each way selection.
-
Now, if you're pushed for time, you may want to simply go with
those selections. That's fine, and it works well.
The way I personally use this information - and the way I believe
it's best utilised - is to take the shortlist and make further
eliminations based on your own criteria as well as the secondary
trends.
Either way, IBRT is the only information I use prior to sizing up
Irish races.
Tony is a stand up guy, who is always there to answer questions
when they arise. IBRT costs €15 a month (about £12.50), or you can
sign up until the end of April for €30.
You can get Irish Big Race Trends here:
http://www.cash-master.com/
Roulette Reaper
Tested and Reviewed by Alistair Moffatt
Roulette Reaper is a software package designed to help you "reap"
lots of profits from online roulette systems.
The software can be downloaded and tried for free. You can use the
software 10 times before you have to purchase a licence, so there
is nothing stopping you from trying it out. The software itself is
pretty standard. Spins are recorded and bets are advised as
necessary. The software actually just keeps a log of losing runs on
5 different strategies (e.g. Red/Black, Columns, Thirds, etc) and
then uses a progressive staking plan as the losing sequence
continues.
As can be expected with these types of systems and, in particular,
this type of staking, the stakes can rise pretty quickly. Roulette
Reaper actually employs two different staking plans - one for the
strategies that pay 2:1 and another for the strategies that pay
3:1. In both cases you can be betting very high stakes in order to
win a very small amount (for example, during the test I was betting
$256 in order to win $1).
The software also includes a list of "approved" casinos - and after
a long losing run, it automatically suggests that you move to a new
approved casino to carry on playing. Of course, this is where the
money is made as signing up to the casinos in question results in a
large affiliate payment being made to the software vendor. In
certain cases, these affiliate payments include a % of the losses
that you make when playing at that casino!
The software itself is actually quite good - it is well written and
stable in operation. It's easy to use and the information shown is
very clear, so following the required bets and staking is a breeze.
However, it is MATHEMATICALLY IMPOSSIBLE to win at roulette in the
long-term, so my advice would be to use the software once at a
series of different casinos (make sure you sign up at the casino
web sites NOT through the software). Make a quick profit and then
retire whilst you are ahead. Do not aim to make large profits as
you will find that losing sequences come along all too often.
Overall I am giving Roulette Reaper a neutral rating - the software
itself works well, but I cannot advise long-term use as you will
inevitably lose money. Used in the manner described above, you
might just scrape a quick buck or two.
You can get Roulette Reaper here:
http://www.cash-master.com/
Portfolio Powerhouse
Tested and Reviewed by Terry Shepherd
Email received today as the trial draws to a close:
"We launched our no cost trial of Portfolio Power House on 13
January, and it was originally going to run till 12 February.
Chris Castell and myself are well aware that any service has to
show a proven track record of verified results, and PPH is no
exception.
This is of course why we offered the trial in the first place.
Results thus far have been disappointing to say the least, ,
therefore the no cost trial is being extended.
How long for I hear you ask...
As long as is necessary is the short answer.
Serious betting is a long term game as you all know, and there are
inevitable ups and downs, so we'll see what the next few weeks
bring before drawing any conclusions."
Can't help wondering 'how long' is long enough in profit before the
service starts to charge. Since one month of profit is not going to
convince anyone with his head screwed on, how long?
This is my last post on this service. Since it is ongoing, I won't
give it the obvious rating.
You can try Portfolio Powerhouse for free here:
http://www.cash-master.com/
Derek Nadin's No 1 LaysUPDATE 19th January 2011
I had an e-mail from one of my regular readers concerning this
system and felt it might be useful to copy it here (with his
permission of course):
"I started following Derek Nadins No.1 Lay system on November 24th
2010 and I'm losing money to date!
I found that on November 30th I couldn't get my £100 bet on in the
"live" market with Betfair two minutes before the scheduled off
time on BOBS DREAMFLIGHT as it was trading at well over 17.0 (the
upper price limit for the No. 1 Lay system) and in fact it was
trading at between 18.00 to 19.00 so I left the bet alone and to
my horror the returned BSP was 15.50 so it had qualified as a bet
after all.
I've found out that these horses can move dramatically in price
either way between 2 or 3 minutes before the scheduled off time and
the returned BSP.
With FLAXEN FLAKE on December 13th, I took 14.30 in the "live"
market about 2 or 3 minutes before the off time only to find that
its BSP had drifted out to 18.40 so it was NOT a qualifying bet but
luckily for me he finished out with the washing!
After my experience with BOBS DREAMFLIGHT I decided to take the BSP
on all horses that were trading near the 17.0 limit at 2 or 3
minutes before the off time and on December 6th as ROSY DAWN was
trading around the 17.0 mark I went BSP and to my horror found that
Betfair had only "matched" £83.97 of my £100 bet and they tell me
this is quite normal!
When I e-mailed Derek Nadin of course I didn't get a reply as he
claims to only have either NO winners, 1, or at most 2 winners
(losing bets) every month when in fact he had THREE winners (losing
bets) in December with OCEAN OF PEACE at 9.00 BSP, CODA AGENCY at
14.20 BSP and BUXTON at 6.40 BSP - making a 9.50 points LOSS on the
month and so far in January only ONE horse has qualified within the
17.0 BSP rule and that was BARBROLLI who lost on January 14th.
Graham, nearly all (90%) of these horses picked by the No.1 Lay
system go off at bigger than 17.0 BSP and many times there are one
or two NON RUNNERS bringing the field down to below the 10 runner
requirement and when that happens SODS LAW kicks in and the one or
even two nags that are below 17.0 both lose -Hmm!!!.
Derek Nadins claim to having around 180 bets a year (July to April
only) and only 7 of them winning at an average BSP of 8.78 is pure
bulls**t as my Betfair account can testify!"
Now, to be fair to Derek, this could just be a poor run for the
system and Winter is generally a poor time for racing anyway, but
in light of the above e-mail I feel it prudent to move this system
to the Neutral section.
UPDATE 3rd February 2011
And I have a further update for this method. Looks like it's now
one to avoid!
"Dear Graham,
Well you wanted an update on Derek Nadins No.1 Lay system so here
we go.
After a 9.50 point LOSS in December 2010 with THREE winners at 9.00
BSP, 14.20 BSP and 6.40 BSP unfortunately things have gone from bad
to worse!
There have been 6 qualifying bets since December and all six lost
so a net profit of 5.70 points and then tonight 3/02/11 DUNEEN
DREAM won at 15.50 BSP so a LOSS of 8.80 points since December!
I have now ceased to follow this Lay system as from tonight as
Derek Nadins claimed past results over the last two years bear no
relationship to reality - Hmm!
I have LOST £1,830 following this so called No.1 Lay system and
enough is enough!."
Losing Lays
Tested and Reviewed by Terry Shepherd
This service has fallen into one of those dips which every service,
especially lay services, does. In December, when I first took
notice of it, I was impressed by the results and the excellent
strike rate, well into the Eighties. However, since I started this
trial it has simply spiralled down into disaster, now being
46.70pts down in about three weeks.
Since, at one point per bet and with the current strike rate at
64%, we can hardly hope to recover this lost ground, I have decided
to terminate this trial. The previous performance showed over 20pts
a month of profit but even when the service returns to that happy
state, it would still take 2-3 months to recoup. With subscriptions
added, this becomes an even more daunting task so I have to say
that, at least for the reasonable future, it is Failed.
You can try Losing Lays here:
http://www.cash-master.com/
Deja Vu Football
Tested and Reviewed by Michael Horton
Murphy's Law has been at work and since I stopped trialling the
service results have improved.
According to the results on the site, when I began this trial the
service was doing well. I thought that it may have merit, but
assumed that - because of the sometimes very high odds - there
could be long losing/ unprofitable runs. Consequently, I decided
that if the service was not in profit by the end of the month's
trial I would extend it for a few more weeks, which is what I did.
The website is easy to navigate and it is very easy to check the
accuracy of the results. There was never an occasion, nor should
there have been, when the site recorded a result differently from
me. This has not been my experience with all services.
All results on the website reflect accurately the selections that
were given. The only differences were in the prices obtained and
this tended to balance out. Where a selection was a winner,
sometimes the site recorded a price better than the one I took and
sometimes it was the other way round. Although the site records the
winners showing "best available odds", sometimes I managed to
improve on the "official" price.
So, the recording of the results on the website cannot be faulted.
Unfortunately, the service itself has performed poorly during the
trial period and the bank was seriously depleted. On each
qualifying match four "mini" bets of £10 are placed. With something
like 10-15 matches each weekend, £40 per match from a £1000 bank is
too rich for me and I would have been a lot more comfortable
risking £20 per match.
I am in no doubt that the service is genuine and anyone who has
been subscribing since it was launched would be showing a profit.
The nature of the service is such that long unprofitable runs
should be regarded as inevitable and that has been the case during
the trial. However, given that some of the selections are at odds
of 50/1 and over and that there have been a number of winners at
these prices, performance could turn round quickly.
As the bank was down by two thirds by the end of the trial, I have
no choice but to recommend that the service be filed under Failed.
However, for anyone who doesn't mind the potential long losing
runs, it would be worth visiting the site from time to time to see
if fortunes have turned round.
You can try Deja Vu Football here:
http://www.cash-master.com/
That's it for me this week.
All the best
Graham
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий